福爾摩斯偵探記得讀后感200字求好心人幫我
讀完《福爾摩斯偵探記》，那些離奇的故事情節(jié)，福爾摩斯那些細(xì)微的偵探，令我驚奇不矣
然后，我陷入了深深的思索：人的智慧是不是無邊無際的呢
是不是智慧決定成就的高低的呢
如果說每個人的潛能智慧是相同的，福爾摩斯可算是非常努力的一位，而多數(shù)人都沒有讓他的智慧閃光，所以說，我們不僅要提升智能，更重要的是生活中的探索和實踐，才能產(chǎn)生豐碩的成果。
福爾摩斯偵探集讀后感 急急急謝謝
我讀了爾探案全集》，這本書讓我無窮，受益。
柯南道爾的精密設(shè)計是福爾摩斯的形象更加使我著迷。
書中的故事合情合理，又有意料之外，情理之中的感覺。
福爾摩斯豐富的科學(xué)知識，嚴(yán)密的邏輯推理，細(xì)致的調(diào)查研究讓我敬佩。
從這之后，我思考更加嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)仔細(xì)。
扣人心弦的故事情節(jié)，使我對這本書愛不釋手，記憶猶新：比如福爾摩斯那雙會閃現(xiàn)靈光的雙眸；華生那時時作痛的肩膀；墨里亞蒂那泛著冷峻笑容的嘴角……都活靈活現(xiàn)的展現(xiàn)在我們面前，讓人不禁拍案叫絕。
福爾摩斯，這個不朽的名字；柯南道爾，一位令人欽佩的作家——譜寫了一篇絕世佳作。
大偵探福爾摩斯2的100字英語觀后感。
。
讀《福爾摩斯——血字的研究》有感 我最近讀了《福爾摩斯——血字的研究》，這篇文章讓我感受頗深、受益匪淺。
文章講的是一個叫杰弗遜的人為了給自己的女友露西復(fù)仇、而去殺折磨露西郁郁而盡的兩個人，最后也因為自己的動脈血管瘤癥發(fā)作而死的事情。
讀完這篇文章，我認(rèn)為杰弗遜是一個忠義耿直、心地純潔而善良的人，但是他卻因為一時的仇恨沖昏了頭腦，變成了一個殺人狂魔，這實在是很可惜。
我認(rèn)為他應(yīng)該向當(dāng)?shù)卣笾?、?yīng)該報警，只可惜他并沒有那樣做。
福爾摩斯這個人，大家都很熟悉。
他是一個性格、脾氣都很古怪、卻學(xué)識淵博、觀察仔細(xì)的大偵探，他在任何地方都能學(xué)習(xí)，在任何地方都能推理，這是為什么呢
讀完這本書，我終于明白了，因為他非常善于學(xué)習(xí)，并且能夠刻苦研究。
我要學(xué)習(xí)福爾摩斯刻苦學(xué)習(xí)、刻苦鉆研的精神，在生活中學(xué)會觀察，不斷開闊視野，只有這樣，才能善于從小細(xì)節(jié)中發(fā)現(xiàn)大問題，要養(yǎng)成善于觀察、樂于觀察的好習(xí)慣，像福爾摩斯一樣擁有敏銳的洞察力，像他一樣擁有廣博的知識
求福爾摩斯偵探集的讀后感，字?jǐn)?shù)在600-650之間。
《福爾摩斯偵探小說全集》是歐美偵探小說的早期經(jīng)典之作，它以跌宕起伏的情節(jié)，縝密的邏輯推理，細(xì)致的心理分析以及福爾摩斯這個家喻戶曉的偵探形象，打動著我的心。
正可勝邪，人皆懂之。
這個道理在書中得到進(jìn)一步的體現(xiàn)。
文中的作案者無論多狡猾、多狠毒，總逃不過福爾摩斯銳利的目光，與他出色的推理能力。
例如在《鬼足之謎》案件中，當(dāng)時現(xiàn)場的死者充滿恐懼的眼睛、扭曲變形的臉龐，還有兇手的狡猾與喪心病狂，使其余的偵探懷著震驚、驚訝的心情退出偵查工作。
可敬業(yè)的福爾摩斯就現(xiàn)場一把可疑的椅子，還有一些別人不曾注意的粉末，精彩地為我們揭開了一個個出乎意料的謎底，巧妙地破解了這個當(dāng)時轟動一時的奇案!世界上，總有像福爾摩斯一樣為社會伸張正義的人。
假如你犯了法，做了不道德的事，即使你有著高超的智慧，但你的邪-惡也會出賣你，暴露你的一切。
你逃得了一時，也逃不了一世，所謂“若要人不知，除非己莫為”，繩之于法便是你的下常別忘了不僅是“天網(wǎng)恢恢，疏而不漏”，而且任何罪惡都逃脫不了正義的懲罰。
另一方面，如果你受到不法分子的傷害，你不應(yīng)屈從于黑暗勢力，你應(yīng)該勇敢地跳出這個圈套，找到“正”來勝“邪”。
倘若你放棄了，“邪”將會四處蔓延，傷害到更多的人。
與其漫無目的地等伸張正義的人來拯救，不如就讓自己成為“正義之君”，以自己強勁、不可阻擋的正義之風(fēng)吹倒這座搖搖欲墜的黑色之屋，你就會得到解脫……邪-惡，總需正義來擊敗，總需正義來阻止，就像福爾摩斯這個伸張正義的人到了哪里，哪里就會少一份邪-惡。
福爾摩斯的正義感使我佩服，他堅持不懈的精神更讓我肅然起敬!每接一個案子，福爾摩斯都會傾盡全力去解開謎底。
其間不僅有案子本身的離奇，還有作案者的干預(yù)和阻止，被邪-惡沖昏頭腦的他們甚至想要結(jié)束福爾摩斯的生命……面對著死亡的威脅，福爾摩斯依舊義無反顧地走他的路、查他的案。
每一個案子都有失敗、推論錯誤的時候，別人可能會因此而喪失2.讀《福爾摩斯探案集》有感很早就聽說，《福爾摩斯探案集》是一部優(yōu)秀的作品，近日讀來，所言非虛。
讀后，我的思維漫游于其中，嘗試著以“福爾摩斯”的角色來解決書中的種種案件，然而，我發(fā)現(xiàn)自己難以勝任這么一個有著強烈的正義感、敏捷思維、精確推理，廣博知識的人物。
為什么呢?書中描寫福爾摩斯的一段話給了我答案，也使我有了很大的感觸。
書中說：“福爾摩斯是這樣一個人：當(dāng)他心中有一個解決不了的問題時，他就會連續(xù)幾天，甚至一個星期廢寢忘食地反復(fù)思考，重新梳理掌握的各種情況，并從各個角度來審查那個問題，一直要到水落石出，或深信自己搜索的材料尚不充分時才肯罷休。
”正是因為勤奮成就了福爾摩斯。
我們都把福爾摩斯稱作天才，這世上誰都喜歡天才，也希望自己成為天才，但事實上這是非常困難的，沒有辛勤汗水的灌溉，是不可能成為天才的。
所以說，天才源于勤奮。
福爾摩斯是個優(yōu)秀的偵探，他是那么的努力。
從華生的觀察我們就清楚的知道，福爾摩斯所擁有的廣博的知識與破案經(jīng)驗，是他通過不斷地學(xué)習(xí)、不斷的鉆研和不斷地實踐才使得自己有了驚人的偵探能力。
他會因為案件沒有頭緒而徹夜不眠地分析問題，這種勤奮的精神正是我缺少的。
從沒跟他身上，我發(fā)現(xiàn)了許多閃光點，，所以在為他解決的謎團(tuán)拍案叫絕的同時，我更是受到很深的感染。
我一定會積極的向他學(xué)習(xí)。
天才源于勤奮，即使我做不了天才，我也會更勤奮的。
大偵探福爾摩斯2 的觀后感。
急急急不要影評。
劇情網(wǎng)上都有簡介，自己去抄。
觀后感如下：我們要向福爾摩斯學(xué)習(xí)機(jī)智勇敢，敢于與惡勢力作斗爭的精神；向華生學(xué)習(xí)不離不棄，對友情果敢忠誠的精神；像每一個對社會作出貢獻(xiàn)的人那樣忠誠，對祖國懷有熱愛~(P,S這點兒夠不)
福爾摩斯探案集讀后感300字
It's become a central truth of American filmmaking that audiences will watch Robert Downey Jr. doing pretty much anything, and when he's having as much fun as he is as the magnetic center of Sherlock Holmes, there's no choice but to be swept along for the ride. Effectively remaking the original Pirates of the Caribbean as a Victorian London caper, Guy Ritchie combines his kinetic direction with the limitless charms of Downey Jr and Jude Law to come up with terrific entertainment that's equal parts brains and brawn, American recklessness and English manners. In short, it's a blast.The movie is structured essentially as an adventure romance, as Holmes (Downey Jr.) and Watson (Law) try to break up and, through crooked schemes and explosions and near escapes, realize by the end how much they mean to one another after all. At the beginning Watson is preparing to move out of 221b Baker Street, with plans to propose to pretty and proper Mary (Kelly Reilly) and leave the detective business entirely. Holmes, bored and hilariously jealous, attempts to sabotage Watson's engagement and also draw him back into the game, now that an old closed case has suddenly reopened. Months earlier Watson and Holmes put away Lord Blackwood (Mark Strong), an aristocrat who murdered five people via some kind of dark arts ceremony. Watson himself supervised Blackwood's hanging, but when he appears to have risen from the dead, everyone from the police to a secret cabal wants to know how he did it. Blackwood and his legion of followers have plans for world domination via drinking potions and other hocus pocus, while Holmes goes about finding Blackwood in the only way he knows how-- using his not inconsiderable knowledge and foolproof logic. Meanwhile, Holmes's old flame Irene Adler (Rachel McAdams) is back in town, a criminal beauty working secretly for a shadowy boss with a penchant for fancy weaponry. Adler pops up from time to time to help Watson and Holmes in their investigations, and it's clear to the audience that she'll throw a wrench in things even when Holmes hasn't quite gotten there.Dipping into chemistry and pentagrams and the earliest forms of electricity, the plot is all over the place, and I'm not entirely certain I understand how it all fit together in the end. But the story really just provides a vehicle for the action and the fantastic character interactions, one of which delivers slightly better than the other. While some action setpieces, like a fight at a shipyard and the final race against the clock, are brilliantly structured, the fight choreography gets chopped up into bits, with Ritchie cutting too quickly for the audience to see a punch or a kick all the way through. The editing often works directly at odds with Downey Jr.'s physicality, as he throws in a funny movement or a particularly sweet punch, only to see it lost entirely to needless slo-mo and quick cuts.Then again, all that Ritchie noodling works great in Holmes's investigation scenes, allowing him visual flashbacks to all the clues that led him to his conclusions and avoiding the dreadful slowness that comes with most mystery-solving monologues. Miraculously the audience is right there with Holmes even during his most out-there epiphanies, and the equally out-there camerawork pays off well in making this period piece feel unstuffy, but also not gimmicky. He's helped immensely by Hans Zimmer's loose, wily score, one of the best action movie scores I've heard in years.When Ritchie holds the camera relatively still and lets all of the actors play off each other, there's nothing better. Eddie Marsan is hilarious as the frustrated Inspector Lestrade, and Strong's Blackwood makes for a great intellectual equal against Holmes, but when Downey Jr. and Law are together the screen lights up so brightly it could catch fire. Bantering like Cary Grant and Rosalind Russell or trading off punches in a fight, the two actors have rarely looked so self-assured or in synch with an onscreen partner. Watson and Holmes squabble over clothes and the dog, tend one another's wounds and protect one another from injury, and generally make the best action-adventure duo since Indy and Marion. The one downside to all this energy between the boys is that Adler is sold short, flitting in and out of the plot seemingly at random, and rarely getting much out of Sherlock beyond a stolen kiss or two. McAdams is excellent and fiery in the role, but it seems much of her part was trimmed in order to make more room for Downey Jr. and Law. But oh, what a consolation prize that is. As the movie winds down it begins to brazenly set up a sequel, and given the manifold adventures of Holmes and Watson that Arthur Conan Doyle wrote, it's hard to imagine two heroes better suited to a modern franchise. There are surely simpler Holmes stories to tell that won't get so bogged down in plot, and maybe there's a way to let the brains beat out the brawn next time, at least if the fights are going to stay so incomprehensible. But keep this iteration of Watson and Holmes together, and we're likely to follow them anywhere.
